Study finds niacin does not reduce heart attack, stroke risk

“The more relevant observation is that, in this modern era of statin therapy, we’ve made profound progress in controlling LDL.”
William E. Boden
Professor of Medicine
In patients whose bad cholesterol is very well-controlled by statins for a long period of time, the addition of high-dose, extended-release niacin did not reduce the risk of cardiovascular events, including heart attack and stroke.
That’s the finding that was reported on Tuesday at the annual meeting of the American Heart Association by William E. Boden, UB professor of medicine, the study’s co-principal investigator. The results also were published as the lead article in Tuesday’s issue of the New England Journal of Medicine.
Co-principal investigator on the study with Boden was Jeffrey Probstfield, professor of cardiology and medicine at the University of Washington. Both researchers led the Atherothrombosis Intervention in Metabolic Syndrome with Low HDL/High Triglycerides: Impact on Global Health (AIM-HIGH) study.
The purpose of the trial was to find out if, in the setting of well-treated LDL (“bad” cholesterol levels) and low HDL (“good” cholesterol levels)/elevated triglycerides, there was an incremental benefit of adding extended-release niacin.
Unexpectedly, Boden explains, most patients enrolled in the trial met existing guideline recommendations for LDL and non-HDL levels, and therefore would not have been considered candidates for further lipid-modifying therapy.
Many patients with stable heart and vascular disease are still at high risk for cardiac death, heart attack or stroke even after their LDL cholesterol has reached ideal levels—between 40 and 80 mg/dL on statin therapy. It is believed that this increased residual risk occurs because they have too little HDL cholesterol along with high levels of triglycerides.
In the AIM-HIGH study, 1,718 patients received a high-dose (1,500 to 2,000 mg per day) of extended-release niacin, while 1,696 patients received a placebo.
After two years, HDL and triglyceride levels improved in the niacin group, with a 25 percent increase in good cholesterol, a 29 percent drop in triglycerides and a further decrease in bad cholesterol of approximately 12 percent. By contrast, in the placebo group, there was minimal change, with a 10 percent increase in good cholesterol and an 8 percent drop in triglycerides.
The trial found that adding high-dose, extended-release niacin to statin treatment in these well-controlled patients with heart and cardiovascular disease who had low HDL did not further reduce the risk of cardiovascular events, including heart attacks and stroke.
This lack of benefit led the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, upon the recommendation of its Data Safety Monitoring Committee, to decide to stop the trial 18 months before its planned completion.
“If you are a patient with stable cardiovascular disease who has achieved and maintained very low levels of LDL cholesterol on a statin for a long time period, these research findings indicate the addition of high-dose niacin does not improve your risk for future events, and is not needed,” explains Boden.
He cautions, however, that these results do not apply to the majority of patients seen in routine clinical settings, where more than 80 percent are unable to lower their cholesterol levels to the degree seen in AIM-HIGH.
“The AIM-HIGH trial was designed to study extended-release niacin or Niaspan, in a specific, narrowly defined patient population,” says Boden. “That is why the results of AIM-HIGH cannot be extrapolated to apply to a broader patient population, especially higher-risk patients admitted for heart attack or acute coronary syndrome, for example, or those whose LDL, or non-HDL levels, are not as well-controlled as those in AIM-HIGH, where prior studies have shown benefit.
“The more relevant observation is that, in this modern era of statin therapy, we’ve made profound progress in controlling LDL,” Boden continues. “However, based on these results, physicians should not assume that boosting HDL levels with Niaspan is without merit.”
In addition to Boden and Probstfield, members of the writing group that authored the NEJM paper are Todd Anderson, University of Calgary and Libin Cardiovascular Institute; Bernard R. Chaitman, St. Louis University; Patrice Desvignes-Nickens, National Institutes of Health; Kent Koprowicz and Ruth McBride, Axio Research; Koon Teo, McMaster University; and William Weintraub, Christiana Care Health Services.
By: ELLEN GOLDBAUM